Confusion at noon and midnight

Confusion at noon and midnight

시간을 24시간형식으로 적는 나는 12시간형식으로 쓰인 내용을 볼 때 스트레스를 받는데, 특히 12 a.m.과 12 p.m.의 경우.

그래서 Wikipedia의 12-hour clock 페이지를 열어 보았다: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12-hour_clock#cite_note-noonmidnight-7
역시 “Confusion at noon and midnight” 항목이 있.

It is not always clear what times “12:00 a.m.” and “12:00 p.m.” denote. In Latin, ante meridiem (a.m.) means “before midday” and post meridiem (p.m.) means “after midday”. Since noon is neither before nor after itself, the terms a.m. and p.m. do not apply. Although noon could be denoted “12 m.”, this is seldom done and also does not resolve the question of how to indicate midnight.
By convention, “12 a.m.” denotes midnight and “12 p.m.” denotes noon. However, …

Benfotiamine

Benfotiamine

https://examine.com/supplements/benfotiamine/

a relative of the vitamin Thiamine (B1)
that appears to have a therapeutic role in pain reduction and diabetic complications (neuropathies and nephropathies);
confers bioavailable Vitamin B1 after oral ingestion

300-600 mg over the course of the day. oral.
usually in two divided doses with meals.
즉 150 or 300 mg twice daily.

체육과학관 내 CU(아마도)에서 찾은 “동화약품의 퀵앤써액(Quick Answer)”의 성분을 보다가.
https://www.dong-wha.co.kr/product/content.asp?t_idx=722
https://brand.naver.com/dongwhapharm/products/10322214629
Benfotiamine (벤포티아민): 10mg
Riboflavin sodium phosphate (리보플라빈포스페이트나트륨): 6mg
Pyridoxine hydrochloride (피리독신염산염): 25mg
Ursodeoxycholic acid (우르소데옥시콜산): 15mg

Jessica Jones가 돌아온다(Netflix의 새 시즌은 아니고) 하여

Jessica Jones가 돌아온다(Netflix의 새 시즌은 아니고) 하여

Jessica Jones는 Marvel Comics의 캐릭터이지만 Avengers로 대표되고 내게 별로 매력적이지 않은 Marvel보다 내 흥미를 끄는 DC Comics 느낌을 주고, 그래서 그 TV series도 즐겁게 보았다. Jessica Jones가 DC 느낌이라는 의견을 가진 이들이 더 있지 않을까 싶어 Gemini에 물었더니 답이:

You’re not alone in that feeling! While Jessica Jones is undeniably a Marvel character, many people have noted that her tone and style often lean more towards what is traditionally associated with DC Comics.

Here’s why some people might feel that way:

  • Darker and Grittier Tone: DC is often perceived as having a darker, more serious, and often more grounded approach to its characters and storytelling, especially in comparison to some of the more overtly fantastical and lighthearted elements often found in the broader Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) films. Jessica Jones, particularly the Netflix series, delves into very mature and psychological themes like trauma, abuse, and PTSD, which aligns with the grittier feel often found in DC properties like Batman or even some Vertigo imprints.
  • Street-Level and Noir Elements: Jessica Jones operates as a private investigator in Hell’s Kitchen, dealing with street-level crime and personal demons rather than cosmic threats. This noir-detective style, coupled with her cynical and reluctant hero persona, is a common trope that has been heavily utilized in DC, particularly with characters like Batman, John Constantine, or even some aspects of the Gotham Central series.
  • Focus on Psychological Depth: The show, and the comic Alias it’s based on, spends significant time exploring Jessica’s internal struggles and the psychological impact of her past, especially her relationship with Kilgrave. This deep dive into character psychology and moral ambiguity can feel more akin to the character-driven narratives often found in DC’s more mature titles.
  • Less Overtly “Superheroic”: Jessica Jones actively tries to avoid being a superhero. She doesn’t wear a costume (anymore), she’s messy, she drinks, and she’s not interested in saving the world. This reluctance and anti-hero stance, while present in Marvel, is also a strong characteristic of many DC characters who operate in the shadows or outside traditional heroic archetypes.

Similar Opinions and References:

You can find discussions online, particularly on forums like Reddit and in reviews of the Jessica Jones series, where people express similar sentiments. Many reviewers and fans have pointed out the show’s departure from the typical “Marvel feel” and its embrace of a more mature, noir, and psychologically complex narrative, which resonates with elements found in DC’s storytelling.

It’s important to remember that both Marvel and DC have a wide range of tones and styles within their respective universes. While Marvel is often generalized as “lighter” and DC as “darker,” characters like Jessica Jones demonstrate that Marvel is perfectly capable of producing very gritty and mature content, just as DC has its share of lighter heroes. The perception often comes from the most popular or mainstream depictions of their characters.

References:

Discussions on Reddit (e.g., r/JessicaJones, r/Defenders) often feature comparisons of the show’s tone to other comic properties.

Reviews of the Jessica Jones Netflix series frequently highlight its darker and more mature themes.

Articles discussing the differences and similarities between Marvel and DC storytelling often touch upon characters like Jessica Jones as examples of Marvel’s darker side.

Kermit the Frog’s commencement speech to 2025 University of Maryland graduates

Kermit the Frog’s commencement speech to 2025 University of Maryland graduates

‘Leap Together’: Kermit the Frog Gives a Graduation Speech

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/23/us/kermit-the-frog-commencement-speech-university-maryland.html

 

Commencement speaker page

https://commencement.umd.edu/main-ceremony/speakers-honorees/speaker

 

t=7433


그리고 오늘의 Otter Letter도

세서미 스트리트 1969 ①

https://otterletter.com/sesame-street/

 

Heidegger on Technology

Heidegger on Technology

2025-04-28의 에라스무스 독서회에 참석은 하지 못하고 그 다루는 책을 보며 몇 자료를 찾아 둔다.

This is Technology Ethics: An Introduction

An approachable introduction to the philosophical study of ethical dilemmas in technology

In the Technology Age, innovations in medical, communications, and weapons technologies have given rise to many new ethical questions: Are technologies always value-neutral tools? Are human values and human prejudices sometimes embedded in technologies? Should we merge with the technologies we use? Is it ethical to use autonomous weapons systems in warfare? What should a self-driving car do if it detects an unavoidable crash? Can robots have morally relevant properties?

This is Technology Ethics: An Introduction provides an accessible overview of the sub-field of philosophy that focuses on the ethical implications of new technologies. Requiring no previous background in the subject, this reader-friendly volume explores ethical questions concerning artificial intelligence, robots, self-driving cars, brain implants, social media and communication technologies, and more. Throughout the book, clear and engaging chapters describe and discuss key discussions, issues, and themes while inviting readers to develop their own perspectives on a wide range of moral and ethical questions.

  • Discusses how various technologies influence and shape individuals and society both positively and negatively
  • Illustrates how emerging technologies affect traditional ideas about ethics and human self-understanding
  • Addresses the ethical complications of creating technologies that may lead to morally problematic consequences
  • Considers if the benefits of new technologies outweigh potential drawbacks, such as how people interact online through social media
  • Explores how established moral and ethical theories relate to new questions concerning advanced technologies

Understanding Heidegger on Technology

Heidegger on Technology

⌈자연의 개념⌋ (The Concept of Nature: Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College, November, 1919)

⌈자연의 개념⌋ (The Concept of Nature: Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College, November, 1919)

출판사 페이지:

알프레드 노스 화이트헤드가 1919년 트리니티 칼리지에서 진행한 타너 강의록. 화이트헤드의 타너 강의의 주제는 ‘과학철학, 그리고 다양한 지식 분야 사이의 관계 또는 관계의 결핍’이다. 1920년 처음 출간되었을 때 『자연의 개념』은 향후 수년간 철학과 과학의 관계에 관한 가장 중요한 연구 중 하나가 될 것이라는 평가를 받았다. 여러 세대가 지난 지금 『자연의 개념』은 여전히 주의 깊게 읽을 가치가 있는 책이다. 화이트헤드는 실체, 공간, 시간이라는 근본적 문제들을 탐구하면서 아인슈타인의 결과 해석 방법을 비판하고, 자신의 4차원 시공간 다양체 이론을 전개한다. 『자연의 개념』을 통해 소개되는 새로운 자연관은 과학적 연구를 인도하는 많은 어휘와 개념에 새로운 빛을 비춘다.

이 책은 스티븐 샤비로의 표현대로 “화이트헤드 철학의 기본 목적이 그가 ‘자연의 이분화’라고 부르는 것의 절대적인 분열을 극복하는 데 있었다”는 것을 보여 준다. 서양 철학자들은 현상적으로 나타나는 세계(나무의 푸르름, 햇볕의 따스함 등)와 그 안에 숨겨진 물리적 실재를 구분하는 것에 익숙한데 화이트헤드는 이 분열을 완전히 없애 버리려고 한다. 화이트헤드는 자연의 다양한 요소가 어떻게 연결되어 있는지를 분석하는 것이 바로 자연철학이라고 말한다.

화이트헤드에 따르면 언제든 어디서든 무언가가 일어나고 있다면, 거기에 사건이 있다. 사건에 대한 이런 주장은 과학에서 근거를 찾기 힘든 ‘자연의 이분화’ 학설들과 달리, 시공간 전반에 걸쳐 전자기장의 놀이를 전제하는 근대 물리학에 의해 지지된다고 화이트헤드는 말한다. 화이트헤드는 사건에 대한 이러한 개념을 토대로 해서 ‘자연의 이분화’로 빠지지 않는, 자연에 대한 일관된 설명을 추구해 나간다.

  • 저자:  Alfred North Whitehead;  역자:  안호성
  • ISBN:  9788961953764 93100
  • 도서출판갈무리 카이로스총서110
  • 출간:  2025-02-28
  • 분량:  320쪽

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/18835/18835-h/18835-h.htm

 

Theme: Overlay by Kaira __
Fury Road, Pluto